It’s no longer just a millennial thing.

At issue is openness to—and consumption of—animal fats. In its third iteration, a new consumer survey from Coast Packing Company and Ipsos Research indicates that Americans 35 and up are more receptive to including animal fats in their diet than they were a year, or two years, ago—and are acting accordingly.

While the embrace of animal fats by millennials—those ages 18 to 34—emerged as the dominant story in the previous two studies, receptivity to animal fats isn’t limited to millennials. Both age segments of older respondents showed an increase in openness to animal fats, with 35-54 year-olds moving from 12 percent to 15 percent, and respondents ages 55-plus more than doubling their receptivity to animal fats over the past year, from 3 percent to 7 percent. Among millennials, 16 percent say they’re open to animal fats. By gender, men are markedly more receptive than women—15 percent to 10 percent.

A similar relative shift in consumption is occurring among the two older age segments: 35-54 year-olds moved up from 9 percent to 11 percent, and respondents age 55-plus, from 1 percent to 3 percent, marking an increase in animal fat consumption. Among millennials, consumption increased by 13 percent. Mirroring the data on attitudes, consumption by men increased 12 percent vs. 6 percent for women.

As in the original baseline study—conducted in November 2015—this new survey of 1,000 adults examined how attitudes about animal fats in the American diet have changed in recent years, and how consumption patterns may be changing as well. Respondents were asked whether they were more or less open to animal fats, and whether those views extended to actual behavior. Coast Packing is the number one supplier of animal fat shortenings in the Western United States.

“Our latest results show that animal fats are gaining greater acceptance among older Americans,” says Eric R. Gustafson, CEO, Coast Packing. “We’re gratified that there’s more mainstream openness to, and stated consumption of, animal fats by those over 35 since the last time Coast and Ipsos posed these questions. Clearly, healthy animal fats like lard and beef tallow are back, affirming that past surveys were not an aberration.”

As 2018 trend forecasts hit the headlines, foodies appear to agree. “It seems Deep Fried is making a big come back for 2018,” says Fine Dining Lovers in its report, “12 Food Industry Trends for 2018” “Deep fried squash, deep fried and battered eggs, deep fried tempura pizza—we’ve eaten all this in 2017. The deep fried trend seems like it’s here to stay. There’s also a new appreciation for really good deep fried chicken, perhaps pushed by the likes of David Chang who has been smearing caviar on his fried chicken sandwiches for a while now.”

Seconding the notion is LoveFood.com, which includes lard among the “24 Foods You Need to Try in 2018”. “Bakers know the benefits of lard for producing a light, flaky crust. But this rendered pork fat has been shunned over the years from people worried about their health, yet it has less saturated fat than butter. And it’s making a comeback. Give it a go and make these fluffy golden doughnuts.”

“This somewhat older demographic recalls the old days with fondness,” says Ernest Miller, Coast’s Corporate Chef. “These consumers value authenticity and want food that is made with integrity and respect for culinary traditions, food that is true to its roots and culture. That’s why the natural makeup of both lard and tallow matter so much. Neither contains the artificial trans fats found in hydrogenated shortenings. These products are best when minimally processed, which is consistent with the whole movement in food and cooking right now. That makes healthy animal fats both timely and timeless—whatever your age.”

The Coast Packing/Ipsos study was fielded from Oct. 27-31, 2017. Ipsos eNation surveys consist of a minimum of 1,000 completes with adults 18 years of age or older in the contiguous United States. The sample includes individuals selected from the online segment of Ipsos’ iSay/Ampario Panel, and is balanced to be representative of the general population based upon region, gender, age, and household income data from the U.S. Census Bureau. Results have a margin of error of +/- 3 percentage points.